Black Campaign, No! Negative Campaign, Yes!

Does anyone know the difference between negative campaign and black campaign? and what the connected with Jokowi and prabwo our presidential candidates ? let us see..

BLACK CAMPAIGN:
The fundamental difference is black and negative campaign on the content or campaign material. Meanwhile, negative campaigns are campaigns that real material existence or occurrence ever.
Black Campaign or negative campaign is a call for the type of activity the campaign materials are not in accordance with fact or making it up. Black campaign here represents a term that is bad, the ugly, the point should be shunned. Furthermore, its use is defined in the campaign disfigure political opponents. However, the actual can also be interpreted as a bad campaign. The contents tend to contain slander campaign and could not be verified.


NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN: If the material is valid and correct, then the name campaign negative campaign, and this makes ghibah is allowed because of the great serious benefits for Islam and the Muslims as one of the candidates to explain badness.
The key, if the news a lie then called a black campaign, while a negative campaign if the campaign is a real material existence or occurrence ever (fact)

Negative campaign continues to burden presidential candidate from PDI Struggle Party, Joko Widodo, and Gerindra Party, Prabowo. Based on the results of the Indonesian Survey Circle (LSI), the negative issues that could potentially take the vote in both presidential and vice presidential on the next election.

below the negative issues about Jokowi and Prabowo :
Jokowi :
*Jokowi known as a doll candidate of Megawati Sukarnoputri
*Jokowi also considered to lie because it does not keep its promise as the Governor of Jakarta during the period up to 2017.
*Jokowi allegedly involved in the procurement of TransJakarta bus.
*Jokowi defending minorities and ignoring the interests of the majority of Muslims.
*Jokowi considered slow thinking.

Prabowo :
*cases of human rights violations such as kidnapping activists in 1998
*Prabowo is not harmonious family
*Prabowo temperamental behavior and likes to use violence,
*Prabowo was judged to be a success because of its loss and have a lot of debt.

Black campaign does not always provide benefits to the candidates. However, it should be noted that black campaign is not always successful and smooth.
So, black campaign can generate positive or benefit support. But if indicated slander black campaign, it's going to happen would prejudice for the pass it. Black Campaign can be a negative campaign if it is proven and there is clear evidence of beneficial. Black campaign should be avoided, that needs to be done is a negative campaign - to expose the real facts of the case and a track record of excellent presidential candidate Prabowo and Jokowi the evidence presented is reasonable and should be encouraged. The goal is that the people are not one choose to elect a president.

However, it should be noted that during the campaign period before the presidential election pileg 2014 and 2014, then the outcome of the entire campaign of black, white, and negative campaign can be concluded. The conclusion is: Prabowo suggested as a candidate for human rights offender and Jokowi suggested as a candidate that is not clear.